The Site Allocations Development Plan Document
will allocate land for housing for twenty years. It will also
allocate land for spcific other proposals, such as for retail and
employment uses. All proposals will be shown on the Proposals
Map.
Issues and Options Stage
November 2006 Issues & Options Consultation
An 11 week consultation commenced on 29
November 2006 and finished on 16 February 2007.
Read the documents relating to the
consultation:
November 2008 Supplementary Issues and Options Paper (including
Gypsy and Traveller Sites)
This consultation began on 3 November 2008 and
closed on the 19 December 2008.
Read the documents relating to the
consultation:
Maps of Sites:
Map 1:
West Hemel Hempstead (PDF 2.20 MB, opens in a new window)
Map
2: North East Hemel Hempstead (PDF 2.01 MB, opens in a new
window)
Map
3: South East Hemel Hempstead (PDF 1.96 MB, opens in a new
window)
Map
4: Berkhamsted (PDF 1.41 MB, opens in a new window)
Map
5: Tring (PDF 930 KB, opens in a new window)
Map
6: Bovingdon (PDF 619 KB, opens in a new window)
Map
7: Kings Langley and Chipperfield (PDF 773 KB, opens in a new
window)
Map
8: Markyate (PDF 420 KB, opens in a new window)
Map
9: Other 1 (PDF 483 KB, opens in a new window)
Map
10: Other 2 (PDF 380 KB, opens in a new window)
Map
11: Other 3 (PDF 293 KB, opens in a new window)
Responses to the consultation:
Over 2,000 people responded to this planning
consultation. Feedback was sought on suggestions for new housing
sites, possible sites for Gypsies and Travellers and on areas that
should be protected from development.
Comments on site options for Gypsies and
Travellers accounted for 89% of the 2,124 individual responses
received by the closing date of 19 December 2008. In addition there
were seven petitions with 678 signatures.
This feedback is incorporated in a report on
Gypsy and Traveller provision issues considered by Cabinet
councillors on 31 March 2009.
To view comments made and the relating
documents for this consultation please go to the Consultation
Portal
Guide to valid planning considerations and racial comments
We want to ensure that all comments focus on
planning issues and can help the Council reach informed
decisions. The following note offers guidance on
matters that we will take into account and matters we cannot.
Particularly when handling a sensitive and
potentially controversial subject, it is important that:
- responses are written carefully and with respect for the
subject and all people concerned.
This means you should:
- concentrate on the planning issues; and
- avoid any form of offensiveness to a particular racial or
ethnic group (for example Romany Gypsies and Irish Travellers) (see
below).
What is a valid planning concern?
Valid Planning
Considerations:
Things you can reasonably raise with us as a
valid concern in relation to planning issues are as follows:
- conflict with planning policy: e.g. development on the Green
Belt
- affect on the landscape, hedgerows and trees
- affect on important environmental areas, such as wildlife sites
or ancient monuments
- flood risk, drainage effects
- contamination/pollution issues
- traffic generation, access, road safety
- availability of infrastructure – e.g. roads, schools
- loss of current land use
- competing land uses for the site
- alternative locations
Matters which are not Planning
Considerations:
- the intended user of the development – it is the use of the
site in planning terms not assumptions made about the future
behaviour of the intended occupants that is important
- devaluation of property
- ownership
- whether the intended user is liked/disliked, trusted/not
trusted
Offensiveness to any racial
group:
Representations should not:
- be abusive, insulting, stereotyping or threatening;
- seek to apply pressure to discriminate against racial groups;
or
- seek to incite hatred or contempt.
<< Back to
top